Protecting Reality
A couple articles about the infamous (so famous it's IN-famous!) Wikipedia have caught my eye as of late.First, there was an article entitled, "Professors Ban Students from Citing Wikipedia." To sum it up, students are citing Wikipedia as a reference source on their papers and teachers are getting fed up with correcting the exact same wrong information multiple times.
This one I completely agree with. I love Wikipedia, but personally, I chase information I learn from Wikipedia with a grain of salt from the same container I use when someone tells me a fact off the top of their head. It's a good source of information, but I don't consider it accurate until I double-check the facts.
Second was an article about how Microsoft is paying people to change Wikipedia so that the entries about Microsoft are more favorable towards the company. Apparently, this caught Stephen Colbert's writers' eyes as well because last night "The Word" was "wikilobbying." Basically, that whomever has the most cash can make their own reality on Wikipedia. He went on to offer 5 cold, hard American dollars to the first person who changes Wikipedia's entry of "Reality" to read, "Reality has become a commodity."
Colbert has a bit of history tampering with Wikipedia already, so I was excited to check the history of changes page for the "Reality" entry today. Apparently, at one point, the definition was changed as requested, but it was quickly changed back and a protective block was put on the page. Here are some notes from the history page:
1/30 @ 4:39 - "Replaced page with 'Reality becomes a commodity'"
1/30 @ 4:40 - "Protected Reality: blocked - mentioned on Colbert Report"
1/30 @ 4:41 - "Protected Reality: Colbert; there's no way it'll stop in 3 hours (in fact, then the West Coast will hit it)"
I love that these people are protecting reality. It's reassuring to know that there's a thin blue line between myself and roaming herds of unicorns.






Lately, we've been watching "